##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Andrea Casaroli Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy Edoardo Scabini Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4487-912X Marco Virginio Boniardi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy Riccardo Andreotti Callens® AREA3, Via Merini 37 21100 Varese, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-9448 Barbara Rivolta Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy

Abstract

Deep drawing of sheet metal is a crucial industrial process due to its high productivity and low cost per unit produced. Stainless steels are ideal for this process, given their high deformability compared to other steels. Despite its apparent simplicity, understanding how the material deforms during deep drawing is essential to predict the final result. From this point of view, simulation via finite element modelling (FEM) represents a rapid and cost-effective alternative to experimental testing. When properly calibrated, FEM models allow for analysing stress and strain distribution, identifying areas at risk of failure, calculating final wall thickness, and optimizing die geometry. This research led to the development of a FEM model capable of simulating deep drawing under different operating conditions, steel types (AISI 304 and AISI 430) and lubrication. The model was calibrated and validated by comparing the numerical results with those obtained from a series of Erichsen tests. To ensure the accuracy of the true stress-strain curves, the steels were thoroughly characterized through tensile tests, Erichsen tests, and metallographic analyses. A specific method was also developed to represent the true stress-strain curve beyond necking, up to physical failure of the steel. The experiment was conducted according to the principles of DoE (Design of Experiments), combined with statistical analysis using the ANOVA technique.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Integrity of materials and structures

How to Cite

Optimization of austenitic and ferritic steels for deep drawing. Part 2: FEM analyses with damage development. (2025). Fracture and Structural Integrity, 20(75), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.75.13

How to Cite

Optimization of austenitic and ferritic steels for deep drawing. Part 2: FEM analyses with damage development. (2025). Fracture and Structural Integrity, 20(75), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.75.13

Most read articles by the same author(s)