##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Juliana C. Santos University of Brasilia, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0459-8655 Marcus V. G. de Morais University of Brasilia, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4800-4513 Marcela R. Machado University of Brasilia, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7488-7201 Ramon Silva University of Brasilia, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-6236 Erwin U. L. Palechor Federal University of Cariri, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-1882 Welington V. Silva University of Brasilia, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5200-5995

Abstract

Early damage detection plays an essential role in the safe and satisfactory maintenance of structures. This work investigates techniques use only damaged structure responses. A Timoshenko beam was modeled in finite element method, and an additional mass was applied along their length. Thus, a frequency-shift curve is observed, and different damage identification techniques were used, such as the discrete wavelet transform and the derivatives of the frequency-shift curve. A new index called wavelet damage ratio(WDR) is defined as a metric to measure the damage levels. Damages were simulated like a mass discontinuity and a rotational spring (stiffness damage). Both models were compared to experimental tests since the mass added to the structure is a non-destructive tool. It was evaluated different damage levels and positions. Numerical results showed that all proposed techniques are efficient techniques for damage identification in Timoshenko's beams concerning low computational cost and practical application.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Structural Integrity and Durability of Structures

How to Cite

Beam-like damage detection methodology using wavelet damage ratio and additional roving mass. (2022). Fracture and Structural Integrity, 16(62), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.62.25

How to Cite

Beam-like damage detection methodology using wavelet damage ratio and additional roving mass. (2022). Fracture and Structural Integrity, 16(62), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.62.25

Most read articles by the same author(s)