##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Aikaterini Marinelli https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-2509 Matthew Stewart https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-1308

Abstract

An experimental investigation of the mechanical and fracture characteristics of Portland limestone and Corsehill sandstone is undertaken, aiming at enhancing understanding of the structural behaviour of these natural building stones commonly used in both new and restoration projects in Edinburgh, Scotland. A series of three-point bending and four-point bending tests on appropriately cut prismatic samples, in the presence of U-shape notches, were performed and results were interpreted following the concepts of crack mouth opening displacement and fracture energy. The critical crack opening displacement could be further investigated as a fracture criterion, in­dependently of the method used for its determination. At a second stage, the effect of specimen shape and size on flexural strength, deflection at mid-span, crack mouth opening displacement and fracture energy was studied for Port­land limestone. Despite the scattering of results, trends observed comprise (a) the negative correlation between the flexural strength of Portland limestone and the specimen span length and (b) the positive correlation between fracture energy and specimen size. Conclusions drawn are in good agreement with similar ones for other quasi-brittle materials and contribute to the assessment of the fracture behaviour of full size structural members that are often beyond the range of possible failure testing.       

Comments

  1. Latest Oldest Top Comments

    Downloads

    Download data is not yet available.

    ##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

    Section
    SI: Research activities of the Greek Society of Experimental Mechanics of Materi

    How to Cite

    Marinelli, A., & Stewart, M. (2019). Comparative experimental study of the mechanical and fracture properties of Portland limestone and Corsehill sandstone . Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale, 13(50), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.37